Melissus of Samos was a Traditional Greek Thinker who lived during the fifth century B.C.E. He followed the great Parmenides and Zeno of Elea as the last of the Eleactic convention. Generally, he agreed with his predecessors, but he starkly disagreed on the limited and timeless nature of existence.
Before we look into his research, we must always survey the primary works. We all know in reality comparatively little about the last Eleactic philosopher. The majority we know about him is derived from Plutarch's Life of Pericles, in which writing we discover he led a Samian fleet as chief in 422 B.C.E. And he later brought Pericles and the Athenian navy to their downfail.
His best contribution to philosophy remains his dissertation On Nature, big slivers of which Simplicius preserved in his commentaries on Aristotle. Though we don't have all of Simplicius ' work, we do have a great bit of it. Once can read Melissus ' work in the Dielz-Kranz, an enormous collection of Pre-Socratic writings.
Like Parmenides and Zeno, the philosopher believed the world to be quite misleading. All three debated the world was unified, invariable, and motionless. However , he disagreed with Parmenides on two points.
While Parmenides argued that existence was spatially limited, Melissus counteracted that existence was unconditionally unlimited, and while Parmenides thought reality existed in a timeless present, the later Eleactic proposed instead that existence is eternal. Melissus simply built upon their argument by suggesting for a wholly unlimited reality.
The philosopher argued that whatever is must have come to be that way. Since existence to the Eleactics was unchangeable, existence would have never come to be; rather, it just. Thus, existence never had a beginning and, thus, is eternal.
Secondly, he justified existence's eternality in a slightly fallacious manner. He argues that whatever has no beginning is neither eternal nor unlimited. Since existence has no beginning and end, it must thus be eternal and unlimited.
Scholars debate this argument as it obviously expresses a logical fallacy, that has led some to conclude we are missing imperative primary resources to fill in crucial grounds. No matter the absence of resources, Melissus plays a crucial role in the history of philosophy as he made heavy contributions to Eleactic thought and because Plato and Aristotle later depended very heavily on his version of Eleactic Philosophy.
Before we look into his research, we must always survey the primary works. We all know in reality comparatively little about the last Eleactic philosopher. The majority we know about him is derived from Plutarch's Life of Pericles, in which writing we discover he led a Samian fleet as chief in 422 B.C.E. And he later brought Pericles and the Athenian navy to their downfail.
His best contribution to philosophy remains his dissertation On Nature, big slivers of which Simplicius preserved in his commentaries on Aristotle. Though we don't have all of Simplicius ' work, we do have a great bit of it. Once can read Melissus ' work in the Dielz-Kranz, an enormous collection of Pre-Socratic writings.
Like Parmenides and Zeno, the philosopher believed the world to be quite misleading. All three debated the world was unified, invariable, and motionless. However , he disagreed with Parmenides on two points.
While Parmenides argued that existence was spatially limited, Melissus counteracted that existence was unconditionally unlimited, and while Parmenides thought reality existed in a timeless present, the later Eleactic proposed instead that existence is eternal. Melissus simply built upon their argument by suggesting for a wholly unlimited reality.
The philosopher argued that whatever is must have come to be that way. Since existence to the Eleactics was unchangeable, existence would have never come to be; rather, it just. Thus, existence never had a beginning and, thus, is eternal.
Secondly, he justified existence's eternality in a slightly fallacious manner. He argues that whatever has no beginning is neither eternal nor unlimited. Since existence has no beginning and end, it must thus be eternal and unlimited.
Scholars debate this argument as it obviously expresses a logical fallacy, that has led some to conclude we are missing imperative primary resources to fill in crucial grounds. No matter the absence of resources, Melissus plays a crucial role in the history of philosophy as he made heavy contributions to Eleactic thought and because Plato and Aristotle later depended very heavily on his version of Eleactic Philosophy.
About the Author:
For more info on Presocratic Thinkers, visit the Best Philosophy Books blog. Or maybe you might search for some great philosophy books to strectch your understanding!
No comments:
Post a Comment