The Reason Why Flowers Are Often Associated With Gladness

By Evan Brower

Flower pictures are a great source of happiness. They are looked upon as something that incurs happiness from deep within. This is why a lot of households have flower pictures situated in their living room because they want to invite happiness inside and when guests arrive, it immediately gets their attention.

You can use those flower image to decorate your own house or some items in your house. You can get those images from the internet while some you can get them yourself.

Women especially are more closer to these kinds of images than men so it perfectly fits them. These images are perfect as background decoration or the main decoration itself.

Some pictures can instantly capture your attention. It is up to you to choose which of these flower images are good at captivating you. Some choices can be inexpensive while others are expensive to purchase.

As you can see, spring and summer times are usually the seasons when flowers bloom. Therefore making it the best time to take photographs of them and recreate them as gifts later in the year for them to be reminded of the summer and spring. You can get creative when it comes to taking photos of flowers and turning them into gifts.

You can try different angles on the same flower or you can try different backgrounds on the same flower. All you need to do is to try out each and every angle and background you can see which one is the best. You can even attach other items to make sure that your flower stands out from its natural background.

You can look for some inspiration and some guide on how to take photos of your favorite flowers over the internet. Study how the photographer has taken the picture. And if you are not fond of taking pictures, you can purchase those images and send them over as gifts.

Find the right picture to fully satisfy your receiver. You can hone your skills in photography if you learn how to capture photos of flowers. When you have captured the perfect flower photo, you can give it to a special someone.

About the Author:

Enjoy more of this writer's writing regarding things including document scanning services and automatic photo scanner.

Proving God Exists In Anselm's Ontological Argument

By Der Geheim Philosoph

For centuries, scholars have debated Anselm's Ontological Argument. St. Anselm purportedly originated the argument during his life time from the eleventh-twelfth centuries A.D. Although much controversy surrounds the argument, the argument contributed a significant legacy to the history of Philosophy.

In a priori fashion, Anselm's Ontological Argument attempts to prove the existence of God. The arguments start by deeming God the greatest thought of which could be thought. Therefore, God exists as an idea in any individual subject. However, an idea that also exists in reality is much greater than a mere subjective idea. If we confine God only to the mind, then we can think of something greater than God. Since no thought is greater than God, it necessarily follows that God must exist.

Although the syllogism is straight-forward, many contested the argument's value. A contemporary critic of Anselm, Gaunilo of Marmoutier, saw the argument as ludicrous. He posed that one could replace the concept of God with some fictitious island, which, as a result, would prove the existence of a clearly fictitious island. Gaunilo's argument fails, however, because the concept of an island does not presuppose ultimate ideals such as infinity, eternity, and the like, but we easily understand Gaunilo's point.

Some years later, the scholastic St. Thomas Aquinas clearly rendered St. Anselm's Ontological Argument much less effective. Aquinas countered by noting that Anselm rhetoric only persuaded those who already conceived God as the greatest idea of which could be thought. Aquinas suggested that many different thinkers think of God in different ways, and as a result, could not begin with Anselm's initial premise.

Immanuel Kant, some centuries later, very strongly opposed the St. Anselm's Ontological Argument. He contended that existence cannot be a predicate of an idea. For if an idea produced or caused existence, the preceding idea could not exist because existence occurs after the fact. Heidegger would similarly deem this a type of onto-theology.

Many other critiques exist as well. David Hume might, for example, conclude that the argument does prove the existence of God because all a priori arguments are necessarily valid. However, Hume rejected a priori arguments as sound epistemological justifications.

The argument faces critique other than soundness. The argument too implies a certain dualism, where ideas and reality come to exist in two separate realms of existence.

Although many scholars pounded Anselm's Ontological Argument, they certainly recognized its power, its persuasive rhetoric, and its simplicity. The Ontological Argument illustrates the power of deductive arguments, contributed a great deal of consequential debate on the concept of God, and highlights metaphysical paradoxes.

About the Author:

More Anselm and Philosophy at Best Philosophy Books, and find more Anselm resources at Anselm's Ontological Argument.