Charity is something that invokes concord and progress in society. But is there more to charity than only donating freely to a cause? Etymologically, philos denotes love and anthropos signifies humankind. Caring for humankind must therefore go along with the wish to support society.
Philanthropy is a great benefit to our planet because it carries with it the idea that, on a basic level, we are all connected by our humanity. It can drive home the idea that we can aid ourselves when we aid others. It's the height of solidarity, as we make real our joint capability, individual by individual.
And this development is getting bigger and bigger as time goes on. There seems to be a rise in young philanthropists that emphasize quality of life and humanistic efforts. I read an article about Sara Bronfman, for example, who devotes much of her endeavors into creating and endorsing humanitarian organizations. Who knows why youthful folks seem to aspire to philanthropy? Perhaps it has to do with technological evolution and newer sources of media; everybody is connected. However you choose to look at it, humanitarianism is definitely trending, and becoming trendier and trendier as time goes on.
Are you familiar with Paul Newman, who helped set up Newman's Own? He built his business with health and philanthropy in mind, and has contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to thousands of charities since the company started in 1982. One other individual who has offered a lot of money to humanitarian associations is Warren Buffet.
But where is all this money going; and is this altruism actually effective? Philanthropic efforts certainly give support to the world, but does the support persist over time? Can you even launch an organization that has a long-lasting consequence for society? A lot of current humanitarians are facing these questions and more, as certain problems plague society more and more. The goal is not only to help those in need near us, but also to give them power during the course of action. What types of deeds would give power to those who require it the most? The best kind of compassionate act is one that not only fulfills a basic requirement for someone, but also teaches him how to do it for himself, I believe. There happen to be a lot of altruistic organizations that assist in teaching someone how to take care of himself and to develop a particular skill set. Out of every compassionate deed possible, these will enduringly affect mankind for the better.
Philanthropy is a great benefit to our planet because it carries with it the idea that, on a basic level, we are all connected by our humanity. It can drive home the idea that we can aid ourselves when we aid others. It's the height of solidarity, as we make real our joint capability, individual by individual.
And this development is getting bigger and bigger as time goes on. There seems to be a rise in young philanthropists that emphasize quality of life and humanistic efforts. I read an article about Sara Bronfman, for example, who devotes much of her endeavors into creating and endorsing humanitarian organizations. Who knows why youthful folks seem to aspire to philanthropy? Perhaps it has to do with technological evolution and newer sources of media; everybody is connected. However you choose to look at it, humanitarianism is definitely trending, and becoming trendier and trendier as time goes on.
Are you familiar with Paul Newman, who helped set up Newman's Own? He built his business with health and philanthropy in mind, and has contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to thousands of charities since the company started in 1982. One other individual who has offered a lot of money to humanitarian associations is Warren Buffet.
But where is all this money going; and is this altruism actually effective? Philanthropic efforts certainly give support to the world, but does the support persist over time? Can you even launch an organization that has a long-lasting consequence for society? A lot of current humanitarians are facing these questions and more, as certain problems plague society more and more. The goal is not only to help those in need near us, but also to give them power during the course of action. What types of deeds would give power to those who require it the most? The best kind of compassionate act is one that not only fulfills a basic requirement for someone, but also teaches him how to do it for himself, I believe. There happen to be a lot of altruistic organizations that assist in teaching someone how to take care of himself and to develop a particular skill set. Out of every compassionate deed possible, these will enduringly affect mankind for the better.
About the Author:
If you need more information on the matter follow Sara Bronfman. Alternatively you can select Keith Raniere, Founder of NXIVM and Executive Success Programs.
No comments:
Post a Comment